Showing posts with label spectacle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spectacle. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Spectacle




Since before the writings of Shakespeare, authors, politicians, teachers, script-writers, and preachers have known that if you want people to hear what you have to say and keep talking about it long after the event, you must start with a spectacle. Shakespeare’s best-known example, the three weird sisters (or witches) at the introduction of Hamlet, was designed to capture and hold the attention of both commoners and royal family members. The Half-Time spectacle at Sunday’s Super Bowl, piloted by Katy Perry, was an attempt to do the very same thing; and people were talking about it after the spectacle had fizzled down to a few late sparkler-type fire-works. The producers of the show clearly had two audiences in mind. One audience was 72,200 University of Phoenix Stadium viewers and the other audience was the 114.5 million television viewers. This time both audiences were treated to the same spectacle, but I wonder how long it will be before someone gets the idea of delivering two different shows to the two distinct audiences.

The question that comes to my mind is this: how do the rest of us mere mortals hope to get anyone to listen to us? Very few have the budget that Super Bowl producers have to throw at a message. If I want to make an announcement at church, I may throw in a small joke to keep people alert and focused, but I have never considered riding a tiger puppet across the stage to make my point. Well, okay, I did consider it, but the finance team wouldn’t give me the budget.

And let’s compare the messages. Although coherent themes may be hard to find, the message of the Half-Time Show, and the Super Bowl in general, seems to be that, “You can do anything you want if you put your mind to it and do your best to roar.” “You can be a shooting star.” “You can beat the opposition with words and positive thinking before ‘the game breaks out.’”

In another place and another time, the message delivered in most churches on Sunday mornings is far more consistent. In simple terms, the message is “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind. Love your neighbour as yourself.” Must we create a spectacle to get people to hear this? Or are we missing a whole other medium? Rather than competing with the spectacles, perhaps we could model a different message. Perhaps we could be the simple Simon and Garfunkel with a guitar and straightforward harmonies. (Not a bad idea for next year’s Half-Time Show.) Perhaps we could be Martin Luther King Junior with a message of non-violence and a life-style of non-violence to back it up. Perhaps we could be Jesus to the people of this overly entertained continent.

"But how can they call on him to save them unless they believe in him? And how can they believe in him if they have never heard about him? And how can they hear about him unless someone tells them?” Romans 10:14 New Living Translation

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Spectacle or Substance

It is fascinating to observe the cultural shifts taking place in North America. The entertainment industry is a great place to watch it happen. Changes in the way music is bought and sold and how people make money in the business are moving rapidly. We live in the era of spectacle rather than substance. We no longer simply listen to music; we experience the spectacle of the song. The 55th annual Grammy awards were handed out on Sunday evening with much spectacle . . . and some substance. Rare were the moments of both.

One could go on about which aspects of the show were substance and which were spectacle but instead I will take us back to a time when substance was primary. Compare a performance by the Beatles on the Ed Sullivan show in August of 1965 with the opening act of the Grammy show in 2013. Both feature "break-up songs" about a woman who is leaving the relationship and a man who is sad; but there the similarities cease. Below is a sampling of lyrics and then links to the performances on YouTube.

"Ticket To Ride" (The Beatles)

I think I'm gonna be sad,
I think it's today, yeah.
The girl that's driving me mad
Is going away.

She's got a ticket to ride,
She's got a ticket to ride,
She's got a ticket to ride,
But she don't care.

She said that living with me
Was bringing her down yeah.
She would never be free
When I was around.

She's got a ticket to ride,
She's got a ticket to ride,
She's got a ticket to ride,
But she don't care.
"Ticket to Ride" on YouTube.  ("Ticket to Ride" starts at about 9:50 into the video but the whole 18 minutes are great.)

"We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together" (Taylor Swift)

I remember when we broke up the first time
Saying, "This is it, I've had enough," 'cause like
We hadn't seen each other in a month
When you said you needed space. (What?)
Then you come around again and say
"Baby, I miss you and I swear I'm gonna change, trust me."
Remember how that lasted for a day?
I say, "I hate you," we break up, you call me, "I love you."

Ooh, we called it off again last night
But ooh, this time I'm telling you, I'm telling you

We are never ever ever getting back together,
We are never ever ever getting back together,
You go talk to your friends, talk to my friends, talk to me
But we are never ever ever ever getting back together

Grammy performance on YouTube.

In 1965, performances were much more about standing up and singing a song. The harmonies were real and blended into a few microphones on stage (note how McCartney and Lennon blend their voices into one mic). The performers played their songs and sang while the audience listened and cheered. But even in 1965 the seeds of change were being sown. The television audience sat quietly and listened to the guitars, drums, and voices; but the studio audience screamed and swooned. The sound from the Ed Sullivan performances had to be washed to remove some of noise of the crowd to improve the quality of sound. The performance of "Yesterday" featured Paul McCartney singing and playing along with a backing track. Could John, Paul, George, and Ringo foresee the spectacle that they were just beginning to introduce? What must Sir Paul have been thinking as he watched the opening of the 2013 Grammys. It is quite possible he was not watching at all. Instead, McCartney may just have been over in the old Abbey Road Studio writing a song. Maybe even a pop song with substance.

Complete lyrics available at the following links.
Ticket to Ride
Never Ever Getting Back Together

Special thanks to Maureen who suggested I turn my living room rant into a blog post.