tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4041731173272503898.post482004311091947074..comments2023-04-14T05:49:50.333-06:00Comments on Thirst: Tidal PoolKeith Shieldshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09162686388135537072noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4041731173272503898.post-40445697354845616342012-02-02T13:03:58.752-07:002012-02-02T13:03:58.752-07:00Thanks for the comment. There is good food for tho...Thanks for the comment. There is good food for thought in your words.Keith Shieldshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09162686388135537072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4041731173272503898.post-71931457267185433732012-02-02T12:51:30.224-07:002012-02-02T12:51:30.224-07:00I would say that we can 'love' God and ...I would say that we can 'love' God and 'love' the inquiry of science. I would say that the two are so closely intertwined that a man could study either and gain perspective of the other. Having read your narrative it became apparent to me that perhaps on reason the two have been at odds with each other is the vocabulary. Science has a very distinct vobaculary, as does the Church(es). <br /><br />I see this conflict all the time in academics where the Sociologists who are in the faculty of Arts don't understand or relate to the ideas of Psycology which is also in the faculty of the Arts. Each faculty becomes like an island of ideas using its own words and with those words, their own meanings and perceptions. <br /><br />I never had the chance to learn about the Philosophy of Language in university, but it - as I understand it - was a very influcential force within the academic community of philosophy during the 20th century. Perhaps if you can define the links between theism and science in language, you can contemplate the bond and write about it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com